Home > Beliefs Survey > Federal Senate 2004
List of Candidates for South Australia (SA)
= previously sitting member
TicketBallot PositionCandidatePartyQ1Q2Q3Q4Q5Q6Q7Q8Q9Q10Total
A1KLOTZ, RolfIndependent 00000000000
A2SMITH, MarkIndependent 00000000000
A3MUNRO, RobynIndependent 00000000000
A4MAY, IvanIndependent 00000000000
B1WINTHER, Kane Independent 00000000000
B2WINTHER, ClaireIndependent 00000000000
C1STANKO, AndrewIndependent 00000000000
C2WOODARDS, DamianIndependent 00000000000
D1PHILLIPS, Andrew JOne Nation 10710101010107101094
D2HILLE, Basil VOne Nation 10101010101010101010100
E1LEES, MegAustralian Progressive Allian 00000000000
E2JONES, KirkAustralian Progressive Allian 00000000000
E3MACINTOSH, JennyAustralian Progressive Allian 00000000000
F1BERTULEIT, TomSocialist Alliance 00000000000
F2McDONELL, AmySocialist Alliance 00000000000
G1McEWEN, AnneAustralian Labor Party 7222102332235
G2HURLEY, Annette KayAustralian Labor Party 7222102332235
G3WORTLEY, DanaAustralian Labor Party 7222102332235
H1MINCHIN, NickLiberal 102521022710353
H2VANSTONE, AmandaLiberal 102521022710353
H3FERGUSON, AlanLiberal 107722271010562
H4LAWRIE, SueLiberal 102521022710353
I1NOONE, BrianThe Greens 00000000000
I2McCARTY, ClareThe Greens 00000000000
I3TANITH, MijThe Greens 00000000000
I4MONTGOMERY, SandyThe Greens 00000000000
J1MASON, AndreaFamily First 10101010101010101010100
J2BATES, TonyFamily First 10101010101010101010100
J3TURNBULL, ToniFamily First 10101010101010101010100
K1VENUS, JohnThe Nationals 102521022710353
K2SIPPO, JulieThe Nationals 102521022710353
K3WILLCOURT, IanThe Nationals 102521022710353
L1McLAREN, JohnAustralian Democrats 127322322529
L2RUSSELL, RuthAustralian Democrats 127322322529
L3FRANKS, TammyAustralian Democrats 127322322529
L4SCOTT, JennyAustralian Democrats 127322322529
M1YENGI, BenIndependent 00000000000
M2HUTTON, AlanIndependent 00000000000
N1McSHANE, NicholasEx-Service, Service and Veter 00000000000
N2KAY, JarradEx-Service, Service and Veter 00000000000
O1HUNT, Ritaliberals for forests 00000000000
O2BARONS, Rachaelliberals for forests 00000000000
P1HAHNHEUSER, RalphIndependent 00000000000
P2LANG, BennoIndependent 00000000000
UG1ARMOUR, RichardIndependent 00000000000
UG2LAWRIE, JohnIndependent 00000000000
UG3LUTZ, RichardIndependent 00000000000

FamilyVoice survey scoring rewards openness and honesty. Failure to acknowledge the survey scores zero. A response to the survey is scored separately for each question: full agreement (Yes Definitely) scores 10, Probably = 7, Unsure = 5, Unlikely = 3, total opposition (Definitely Not) = 2, and No Comment = 1. The total score for all 10 questions thus ranges from 0 to 100.

Questionnaire

Candidates were asked to indicate how they would vote or did vote on these issues by answering the questions. If they are bound by party policy on a particular question, they were asked to provide an answer in accordance with that policy.

1. Prayers in Parliament
Prayers in parliament are an important daily reminder that we must all ultimately answer to the higher authority of Almighty God. The prayers, which consist of the Lord's Prayer and a request for God's guidance, are an expression of the Christian foundation and character of our nation. According to the latest census, about 70% of Australians identify with Christian churches.
Do you support the current custom of opening each day of parliament with Christian prayers?

2. Affirmation of Marriage
Evidence abounds that marriage is more beneficial to society than cohabitation. Marriages are more stable and the children of married parents perform better educationally and socially at school, have lower involvement in drug-taking and crime and hence develop into more productive adults. Laws that prohibit discrimination on the basis of marital status prevent preference for marriage and thereby damage society. Such laws should be repealed so that marriage can be affirmed and rewarded.
Would you vote to repeal laws prohibiting discrimination on the ground of marital status, so that marriage can be affirmed and rewarded as more beneficial to society than cohabitation?

3. Child Care Benefits
Surveys indicate that a large majority of parents would prefer one parent (usually the mother) to care for their children full-time at home if they could afford it. Current child care benefits are much more generous to mothers who place their children in child care centres than to those who care for their own children at home. All parents should be treated equally, receiving the same childcare benefit. They should be free to spend it as they choose - on childcare or on helping one parent stay at home.
Would you support legislation requiring equal child care benefits to be paid directly to all parents of young children, whether the children are cared for at home or in a child care centre?

4. Pornographic Videos
X-rated videos, containing numerous explicit scenes of sexual acts and perversions, are currently banned in all Australian states. Studies have linked this kind of pornography with rape, molestation and child sex abuse. Paedophiles often use X-videos in homes to persuade children to 'do what adults do'. However, the federal government allows sex shops in the ACT and NT to distribute them by post to homes throughout the country.
Pornographic videos - classified 'X' - cannot legally be sold or hired from any State: would you support federal legislation banning their distribution from the ACT or NT?

5. Meaning of Marriage
The Australian Marriage Act 1961 assumes the common law understanding that marriage is 'the union of a man and a woman, voluntarily entered into for life' but this definition is not stated explicitly. In the light of recent recognition of same-sex 'marriages' in some foreign countries, the meaning of marriage in Australia should be protected by defining it explicitly in the Marriage Act and prohibiting recognition in Australia of foreign same-sex 'marriages'.
Would you vote to amend the Marriage Act 1961 to define marriage as "the union of a man and a woman, voluntarily entered into for life" and to prohibit recognition of foreign same-sex "marriages"?

6. Abortion Funding
Taxpayers who oppose abortion-on-demand are forced to pay for the killing of unborn children through Medicare. People who conscientiously oppose abortion should not be forced to pay for operations that are ethically offensive to them. Except in extreme cases when the mother's life is in danger, abortion should not be claimable on Medicare, just as face lifts and similar 'social' operations are not claimable.
Would you support a change in Medicare laws so that taxpayers are no longer forced to pay for "social convenience" abortions?

7. Media Standards
Recent trends in television and radio programs to voyeurism and the promotion of violence, drugs, suicide, promiscuity and homosexuality are damaging the social fabric of Australia. These trends also greatly limit the freedom of viewers and listeners who want to avoid offensive programs. The Classification (Publications, Films and Computer Games) Act 1995 needs amendment to tighten standards.
Would you vote to amend the Classification (Publications, Films and Computer Games) Act 1995 to tighten standards and reverse the recent trend towards more violence, coarse language and explicit sex in films and TV?

8. Shared Parenting
The decisions of the Australian Family Court in recent years suggest that it operates on a presumption that the mother will have custody while the father is allowed access to his children for two days a fortnight. The Family Law Act should be amended to require separating or divorced parents to share equitably responsibilities of parenthood and to acknowledge the fundamental right of children to maintain frequent and reasonable contact with both mother and father following parental separation or divorce unless there is a clear and demonstrable risk of harm to the child.
Would you vote to amend the Family Law Act 1975 to provide a presumption of joint custody of children following divorce unless one parent has breached the marital commitment or poses a risk to the child?

9. Discrimination
The educational standards achieved by boys in recent years have been falling and part of the reason is believed to be the scarcity of male role models among primary teachers. In order to redress the balance, scholarships for males to train as primary school teachers should be encouraged. Any anti-discrimination laws preventing such scholarships should be amended because the education of boys is more important than social engineering ideology.
Would you vote to amend the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 to allow affirmative action for males in the provision of scholarships for primary school teaching?

10. Internet Gambling
Addictive gambling on the internet is a growing problem. The Interactive Gambling Act 2001 bans gambling at casino-style websites, but many Australian gamblers flout the ban by using foreign sites. The most effective way of limiting the social problems resulting from compulsive internet gambling would be to amend this Act to require credit-card issuers to identify and block transactions from illegal gambling websites.
Would you vote to minimise addictive internet gambling by requiring banks to block credit card transactions from online gambling websites?